STATEMENT BY AMBASSADOR ALFONSO VALDIVIESO,
PERMANENT REPRESENTATIVE OF COLOMBIA, ON BEHALF OF THE MEMBER
STATES OF THE RIO GROUP

ITEM 169:

SCALE OF ASSESSMENTS FOR THE APPORTIONEMENT OF THE
EXPENSES OF THE UNITED NATIONS PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS

New York, October 6, 2000

Mr. Chairman,

I have the honour to speak on behalf of the 19 Member States of the Rio Group.

We have begun our consideration of agenda item 169 on the scale of assessments for the apportionment of the expenses of United Nations peacekeeping operations under very special circumstances.

The current financial situation of the Organization and its peacekeeping operations is due neither to the special scale nor to the developing countries. In fact, no review of the special scale will be effective if the States Members, and in particular the major contributor, do not fulfil their obligation to pay their contributions in full, on time and without conditions.

What is more, a review of the scale will not be sufficient to change this situation in any significant way, since the economies of all developing countries plus those of countries with economies in transition, together represent barely 18 per cent of global GNP, despite the fact that most of the world's population live in those countries.

The United Nations is facing a payments crisis, which cannot be resolved by placing on an equal footing developed and developing countries. The relatively limited capacity of the developing countries to contribute to the financing of peacekeeping operations should not be interpreted in a manner so as to minimize their contribution to peacekeeping. It is important to emphasize that the best contribution of the developing countries to peacekeeping is to concentrate their resources into areas that would help them achieve a better standard of well-being.

We believe that a revision of the special scale should not mean a relative reduction of the assessments of the permanent members of the Security Council, since it is those members that have a special financial responsibility for the maintenance of international peace and security.

In view of what I have just said, we believe that any debate that takes place in the General Assembly to change the system of apportionment used for the financing of peacekeeping operations must respect the principles set out in resolution 1874 (S- IV) and reiterated in resolution 3101 (XXVIII) on the special responsibility of the permanent members of the Security Council and the relatively limited capacity of the developing countries to contribute to the financing of peacekeeping operations.

The Rio Group categorically maintains that any new agreement on the methodology to determine the special scale must be achieved by consensus, upon conclusion of the negotiations on the scale for the regular budget.

In conclusion, the Rio Group calls on the Secretariat to make available to delegations all the information that they need in a timely manner so that they would have the elements necessary to conduct their negotiations on this item and adopt decisions based on the best available information.

Thank you very much.